|

A few weeks ago I did something that I swore I’d never do.
I bought an iDevice.
This makes me a complete hypocrite. For years I’ve been telling everyone who would listen that Steve Jobs is the antichrist, and that his products are the spawn of Satan. This springs from my deep hatred towards the Mac. I’m not really sure why I hate the Mac, but I do. It’s one of those things that we do without any real provocation, such as disliking a perfect stranger without even meeting them (don’t lie; we all do it). But I’m sure that those odious Apple/PC TV commercials from a few years back have something to do with it. PC users everywhere wished that John Hodgman (PC) would grow a pair and clock Justin Long (Mac) just once, and I was no exception.
Why did I lose my faith and join the ranks of the technologically unwashed? It was a matter of necessity, actually. Last year I missed some important emails while I was on the show floor at E3, so I needed a device that I could use to check my email on the go. Yes, my cell phone would do that. But the quality of service that I get from my pay-as-you-go phone is dodgy at best (thank you, AT&T; my father spent his lifetime working for you—he’d turn over in his grave if he found out what you’ve become), and I have no desire to commit to another monthly bill. In essence, what I needed was an iPhone without the phone. Friends suggested the Zune, but it’s a good thing I passed on that idea, since the actual phones are about to go the way of the dinosaur after the meteor hit.
So, there I was, using the last of my Best Buy holiday gift cards to buy the 4th generation iPod Touch. It does what I need it to do (without a monthly fee), provided that I’m in an area with free wifi, and the App Store provides access to a seemingly endless list of cheap little programs that I can download, although the download process is so streamlined that it’s scary. Once you put your credit card info into the system, you never have to confirm that information again; just press “Buy Now” and it’s yours. Suppose someone gets their hands on my device without my knowledge? That useless unlock feature isn’t going to stop anybody, unless my iPod has stored my fingerprints or scanned my retinas without my knowledge. Amazingly horrible things could be done to my account, and perhaps even my credit. All a potential thief has to do is to hack my iTunes password and it’s all theirs. I’m careful with my passwords, but like most people, not nearly careful enough.
Of course I’d be lying if I said that the wealth of games available at the App Store wasn’t a factor in my decision-making. Sure, Zune has a marketplace with a growing collection of games. But even an Apple-hater such as myself has to admit that the selection available for the iDevices is unparalleled. Most of the stuff is total crap, thrown together by pimply 14-year-olds in their darkened bedrooms in a day or two, but if you stick to the established content providers such as Chillingo or Rovio or PopCap, you’ll usually come out ahead.
Now that I’ve had the iPod for a month or so, it’s time to see how it matches up against my other mobile gaming platform of choice, the Nintendo DSI.
Portability: iPod gets the nod here. I can put the iPod in my pocket and carry it anywhere. The DSI is just a bit too bulky to fit in anything other than a jacket pocket or a backpack. Which is fine in the winter, when we in the Northeast don’t leave our homes without a coat. Not so good in the summer, though.
Graphics: iPod is the clear winner. Or it could be that the only games that I own so far (Angry Birds, Bejeweled 2 and Painkiller: Purgatory) have better than average visuals. The DSI just doesn’t have the clarity and color palate that the iPod possesses. But who knows; maybe as my iPod game collection expands, my opinion might change.
Features: The devices have things in common. Both have cameras installed, both have available web browsers (you have to download one for the DSI, while the iPod comes with one already installed). iPod was designed to be a multifunctional device, not just a game system. It has more installed memory, it has 3G Internet connectivity, and it allows you to connect to your email client of choice. However, the DSI’s extra screen gives it a significant advantage on the iPod when only considering gaming.
Controls: Here is where the DSI puts the iPod to shame. The combination of face buttons and stylus makes it possible to play just about any kind of game with very little trouble. Until someone figures out how to create virtual thumbsticks that are responsive and conveniently placed so that your fingers don’t obscure half the screen, iPod will always trail the DSI in this category.
Games: Here it all depends on which factor is most important to you: quality or quantity. The iPod certainly offers far more available titles, but for overall quality, the DSI is far superior, since there are far fewer piles of steaming dung in the Nintendo library. You’re paying 30 or 40 times more for a DSI game, but the product is usually worth it.
Battery Life: Another big win for Nintendo. I’ve been playing Dragon Quest IX on the DSI for 15 minutes a day on my lunch break (and another hour or so at the laundromat), and I can usually go a couple of weeks before that pretty blue light turns red. But one 15-minute session of Painkiller on the iPod drained almost 25 percent of my battery bar; I’ve been recharging it at least once a week since I got it. Hopefully this problem will be addressed in future generations of the iPod, but right now the DSI takes the longevity prize.
So am I happy with my iPod purchase? Despite my ingrained instincts, I have to say that I am. It’ll get its baptism of fire at E3 in June, but for now I grudgingly admit that it gives me everything that I need from it. However, my Mac prohibition remains inviolate, mostly because anything a Mac can do, a Windows PC can do better (with the possible exception of video editing). PCs are also easier to build and upgrade, and there are far more games available for them (if it wasn’t for Intel CPUs and Boot Camp, Mac owners would still be playing Myst).
But mostly, it’s because anything with a half-eaten fruit on the case is the offal of the evil one. Which is why there’s a crucifix around my neck as I launch those birds at those pigs. You can never be too careful when it comes to your immortal soul.
|
I think your troubles stemmed from using AT&T for your phone service, more so than from anything else. Right now I use G2 with T-Mobile, and I am very satisfied with the quality of both the service and the device. Having played with many phones, including, of course, the iPhone, I am firmly convinced that my decision to go with G2 is fully justified. Until earlier this year I used the G1, and again, I felt that it was a better choice.
Personally I don’t think that Apple is anymore evil than the rest of them. Nor is Steve Jobs. My problem is with the fact that they are mainly selling self-image as opposed to a product to their users. Macs are still computers, iPhones are still phones, and iPods are still MP3 players. The problem is, they are not being sold on their technological merit, but rather on what image of yourself they project to you. The fact that it costs a premium – doesn’t help.
There are maybe a few thousand people in this world who climb glaciers. There are also hundreds of thousands who dress as if they did. Apple’s marketing is aimed as enticing people to buy an equal or slightly inferior product, by posing it as “cool.” And that, in my eyes, is not cool.
Strange comparison. The Nintendo DSI was conceived as a gaming device, the iTouch was not. So to say that the DSI performs better in games is like saying that a plastic cup is better for drinking water than your cupped hands.
Anyway welcome to the dark side. I took the dark step in 1995 [in spite of Intel having a fit as they were my primary sponsor and did not want pictures of me using a G5 Mac] and haven’t looked back. I still enjoy my PC but the Apple ecosystem is a damn cool environment for media people like us.
TRAITOR!!!
The reason we hate Macs are bc they are bloated, costly POS’s that people unknowingly purchase bc they are fashion statements (the tech in PCs are equal or better and yet cheaper). You are not ‘hip’ if you do not own one… all the reason not to own one. I’ll keep my standards and not sell out.
side note: PC’s edit video just as well as Macs… then again, what would I know about that, right???
omegabob – I think it’s interesting that your posts on Avault are prefaced by the delusional thought that you are always right and the rest of humanity is wrong. Anyway carry on insulting all things Apple as I no longer have shares in it. Therefore when your radical opinion causes the unavoidable demise of the company I will not experience a monetary loss. Oops got to go, I’m getting a business call on my fashion statement iPhone.
The majority of humanity use Android and I believe iOS is like 3 or 4th (I cannot remember which, so I cannot verify their place… then again, who cares about who is LOSING the war)
And thanks for your official ‘seal of approval’!!! My authorized rants against Apple shall be… GALACTIC (thats much bigger than EPIC)
I aquired my first ipod recently , not a purchase but a gift from a freind who bought one of those shiny new ipads. Its good for portable music and ive added a few adresses to my contact list on it but thats about it.
When they become obsolete and im not kewl becasue i have one , or 2 , or 3 lets not forget the 64 gig ones ! I can still put them into a sock and give my local Apple store manager a thorough beating.
We at Avault obviously don’t condone the assaulting of innocent Apple employees with their own products. Besides, he’s probably so indoctrinated into the Jobs way of thinking that he’d say, “Look! You beat me to a bloody pulp with that 64 GB iPod and it still works!”
Angel is right about Macs and media. I do all my video editing and podcast creation on my beloved’s Macbook. Similar tools exist for PCs, but iMovie is so much easier to use. I find it humorous that a laptop Apple product is better for media creation than any desktop I own.
To be honest, I can’t understand why there is not even a close software competitor from the Microsoft side. (Actual Microsoft, not 3rd party)
I find it moderately entertaining, how Apple did everything in their power to prevent Adobe from creating a 64-bit version of Photoshop for the Mac. They succeeded too, so now only the PC has it.
As to video editing, there exists a ton of free software for PC. Moreover for serious work Adobe Premiere for PC is not any worse (and actually might be a tiny bit better) than Adobe Premiere for Mac.
I used Adobe Premiere when I worked at Planet Hollywood. I found it a bit meh! and would never clear memory when moving from one project to another.
There are so many images on the Web. How can you know whether an image is original or has been edited by Photoshop? Check it out using Photoshopped Image Killer. Specify your image’s URL and the site will do analysis for you automatically.
Post a Comment