The Adrenaline Vault

Home News Reviews Previews Features Forum Blogs About Us
 




Posted on Thursday, July 9, 2009 by | Comments 7 Comments


Picture from Online games herald the end of discs and expensive PCs?

Play the latest videogames without investing in an ultra-fast computer, a pricey console or even a disc from the local game store. Just log onto OnLive, a Web service that runs processor-hogging games on its own computers and zaps them over the Internet to almost any screen, including your cheap laptop or TV.

The action is almost as quick as if it came from a box in your living room. When you press a key, whether to shoot an enemy or catch a ball, OnLive’s servers calculate the next image at least 15 times as rapidly as an ordinary desktop PC does. Then software compresses the image so it can reach you in less than 80 milliseconds. This compression differs for each user, because OnLive constantly measures the speed of your Internet connection to determine how much data it can squeeze through. Sometimes it does decrease the pictures’ quality.

OnLive works on PCs and Macs with a simple browser plug-in, and on TVs when you add a small console. The beta program begins this summer, and although subscription prices for the winter launch haven’t been set, they’ll probably beat the cost of buying a gaming rig plus that $60 copy of the latest game.

Will this new service really do away with our beloved rigs and the discs that we feed them? Share your thoughts with us.

Source: Popular Science

Related News

Related posts:

  1. No disks needed for startup’s streamed games
  2. NCsoft to develop online PS3 games
  3. Nickelodeon to spend $100 million on online games
  4. EVE Online back online after security breach
  5. Puzzle games thrive on Nintendo’s WiiWare

This Comments RSS Feed 7 Comments:

Alaric | July 9th, 2009 at 3:02 PM Permalink to this Comment

This may work for Peggle, but there will be no running of Fallout 3 at 2650×1600 over this little gimmick. Not until the Internet speeds increase tenfold.

TheClair | July 9th, 2009 at 5:22 PM Permalink to this Comment

80ms? What if it takes me longer than that to route to one of their hubs? Are they going to send me 0 bytes of data? They must have some kind of magic packet carrier pigeon. It’s either that or they’re making exaggerated claims about what they can do.

warren | July 9th, 2009 at 5:45 PM Permalink to this Comment

Fallout 3 at 2650×1600.  That is a lot of pixels.  Think more like what most people are using: 720p or 1080p.  That is more feasible.  I’ve seen it work on http://www.streammygame.com from a normal computer on a LAN.

Audacious93c | July 10th, 2009 at 2:17 PM Permalink to this Comment

But Alaric still has a point.   This will work wonders for the people that generally have a low end PC that they bought for $3/400.  But the people that generally buy a descent PC or a High End Gaming rig will not benefit from hardware like this for years to come.  Games like World of Warcraft have such a large user base, because that game will run on those PC’s.  Albeit not wonderfully, but they can still play it.  Where games that are massive memory hogs, that are absolutely beautiful and are great games (like Fallout 3) or the soon to be released “Aion” only reach a limited audience because of the average computer in America.  This hardware/software package has merit, but not any time soon. It will all come down to the Internet Connection.  Europe as a whole is ahead of us in the bandwith capacity and the US invented the technology.  Silly isnt it?

VaultReader | July 10th, 2009 at 3:25 PM Permalink to this Comment

Hmm lets see I can pay once for a game. Or I can pay monthly for a service that provides the game and probably have to pay an initial fee to get access to each game. Development is not free after all. Oh and how much does it cost to get their special router/modem thing to connect to their service. Also there website says you need their controller. How much does that cost? How many do you get or need to make use of their service. And we all know how most PC games play with a controller (horrible for those who haven’t tried). So at the end of the day you can purchase/rent a service that makes you have hardware, peripherals, and a fee for use. At least with a PC or console you still have the game to play, after buying it or should a company stop existing / supporting a product; here you just end up with nothing. Death of PC games/consoles or whatever this is not. It looks like a shiny version of gametap but with sixteen times the hassle. Oh yeah it requires you to have a broadband service. While that is common for most PC gamers, it is hardly a requirement to run a console (Xbox live withstanding) or many PC games for that matter. I give it a year of service before it goes the way of webtv.

Oh and MMO’s do not count as a comparison for this type of service. They are one type of video game that only a fraction of gamers are into (and then only have enough time to play one MMO at a time), require no extra equipment, and even with their monthly costs they usually run no more than fifteen dollars a month.

omegabob | July 10th, 2009 at 4:54 PM Permalink to this Comment

Most people are poopy heads then! 720p? 1080i/p? LOL! PC Gamers can play as rez beyond HD and shouldn’t expect any less from this product/service.

Also, I hope thats not the final design of the set-top box as it would anger me that it wasnt flat/modular (ie stackable)

Namtaw | July 10th, 2009 at 6:20 PM Permalink to this Comment

It will be interesting to see what hackers and console crackers ultimately do to circumvent the system. As in what neat tricks they come up with. Like sticking a chip in a game console box for instance. Crazy!

Post a Comment


Please leave these two fields as-is:

To add an avatar image by your Avault comments head on over to gravatar.com and follow their simple sign-up instructions. When posting comments on Avault include the same email address you used to setup your free Gravatar account and the avatar you uploaded will automatically appear by your comments. Note: Avault will only display avatars that are rated G or PG.


Follow Us on Facebook   Follow Us on Twitter   Access Our RSS Feed




MOST POPULAR

MOST COMMENTS

LATEST COMMENTS
psycros on Hands On with Kingdoms of Amalur: ReckoningAgree 1000% with Ian! What is it with these...
Ian Davis on Bethesda updates Skyrim for consolesAs a PC gamer, I like the longer console cycle. I used...
Vapus on Bethesda updates Skyrim for consolesOh yes .. PLENTY of life left in The P$3 and Xbox360...
Ian Davis on Hands On with Kingdoms of Amalur: ReckoningI honestly didn’t know this game was...
Marcus Spears on Crazy Machines 2 Complete PC reviewHere’s the manual (for Crazy Machines 2,...
Kromag on Falling out of love with BioWareWell, with ME3 coming out, I wonder if this bioware ban will...
psycros on Steam Workshop debuts with Skyrim modsL4D was fantastic. Didn’t like the sequel nearly...
Steve on RedMere HDMI Cable reviewWhat was the length of the cables they sent you? I’ve seen up...
Matthew Booth on Steam Workshop debuts with Skyrim modsLeft 4 Dead has a pretty healthy mod community....
Ian Davis on Steam Workshop debuts with Skyrim modsI’ve been using the Nexus downloader myself,...
psycros on Steam Workshop debuts with Skyrim modsIf you don’t want to mess with Steam...
Alaric on Ubisoft games to go dark next weekSay “NO” to drugs.
vmxa on Sword of the Stars II PC reviewI dislike the tech tree in the original. It was impossible to...
psycros on Sword of the Stars II PC reviewI’d argue that the original SOTS, while playable, was...
Atomic.Bitch on Ubisoft games to go dark next weekSorry dudes – the bitch has to speak out in...

 
To the Top
QR Code Business Card