<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Total War: Shogun 2 PC review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.avault.com/reviews/pc/total-war-shogun-2-pc-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.avault.com/reviews/pc/total-war-shogun-2-pc-review/</link>
	<description>The Adrenaline Vault is an independent site providing uninfluenced and unbiased video game information.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:52:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Pitruzzello</title>
		<link>http://www.avault.com/reviews/pc/total-war-shogun-2-pc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-109319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Pitruzzello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avault.com/?p=63176#comment-109319</guid>
		<description>With the recent update, there has been a fix so that when opponents use the resign/concede defeat function, the winner actually gets a win tallied and gets the benefit of any perks that could be earned as a result. 

I think this is an acceptable compromise, but I still feel that it would be preferable to penalize quitters for quitting, even if it means that people who legitimately lose their connection are sometimes forced to accept losses they may not have earned. 

I am perhaps colored by my experiences in other RTS games. Too many people I would beat in AOE2 and AOE3 would ask for a draw/save game to mask a losing fight just so they could preserve their win/loss records. To me, not penalizing quitters amounts to a passive acceptance of over-inflated win/loss records. 

Your mileage may vary, however. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the recent update, there has been a fix so that when opponents use the resign/concede defeat function, the winner actually gets a win tallied and gets the benefit of any perks that could be earned as a result. </p>
<p>I think this is an acceptable compromise, but I still feel that it would be preferable to penalize quitters for quitting, even if it means that people who legitimately lose their connection are sometimes forced to accept losses they may not have earned. </p>
<p>I am perhaps colored by my experiences in other RTS games. Too many people I would beat in AOE2 and AOE3 would ask for a draw/save game to mask a losing fight just so they could preserve their win/loss records. To me, not penalizing quitters amounts to a passive acceptance of over-inflated win/loss records. </p>
<p>Your mileage may vary, however. <img src='http://www.avault.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravenus</title>
		<link>http://www.avault.com/reviews/pc/total-war-shogun-2-pc-review/comment-page-1/#comment-109312</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravenus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avault.com/?p=63176#comment-109312</guid>
		<description>How would the game separate a quitter from someone whose connection dropped?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would the game separate a quitter from someone whose connection dropped?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.avault.com/reviews/pc/total-war-shogun-2-pc-review/feed/ ) in 0.13195 seconds, on May 24th, 2013 at 10:59 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 24th, 2013 at 11:29 pm UTC -->